On Reality Asserts Itself, Mr. Shallal says we went from No Child Left Behind under the Bush era to no kid left untested, then to no teacher left unstressed, and our schools are still doing very poorly.
This is an episode of Reality Asserts Itself, produced March 27, 2014.
STORY TRANSCRIPT
PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome back to The Real News Network. Iām Paul Jay in Baltimore. And weāre continuing our series on Reality Asserts Itself with Andy Shallal, who now joins us again in the studio.
Hi, Andy.
ANDY SHALLAL, D.C. MAYORAL CANDIDATE: How are you doing, Paul?
JAY: So Andy runs Busboys and Poets, which is soon going to be about seven restaurants in Washington, D.C. Itās the hub of most progressive things in D.C. And if you want to know more about Andyās bio, watch part one of this series, ācause thatās what itās all about. Weāre going to pick up where we left off.
So weāre talking about your vision for education. Youāre running for mayor of D.C. And Iāll remind everyone that the ground rules for this interview is Andy canāt critique anything about any of the other candidates. He can kind of just give his own vision of the future. And weāre doing that ācause weāre not sure weāre going to interview any other candidates, although weāve asked them.
So your main issues on education, what are the three, four things that need to be fixed, and how would you fix them?
SHALLAL: Sure. You know, the education system in D.C., as we mentioned earlier, needs a lot of fixing. So education reform came in 2007, the Education Reform Act that ushered the era of Michelle Rhee. A lot of people may know who she is. Sheās a national figure now, education reform. So we went from No Child Left Behind under the Bush era to no kid left untested, to no teacher left unstressed, and our schools are still doing very poorly.
So at some point you have to ask yourself: are we going in the right direction? And the answer is clearly no, weāre not going in the right direction. We can learn some things. Of course we can pick up some positive things that have happened along the way. But we cannot continue in this path, because kids are falling off between the cracks. And the kids that are suffering the most are kids of color, particularly black kids. Black kids are dropping out of schools and theyāre not progressing very well. Reading proficiency is at 12 percent. That is not a good record. So we have to reassess.
JAY: The leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties all seem to be on board with standardized testing, and thatās supposed to be the great way out of all this. You donāt think so.
SHALLAL: Well, I think, you know, good results sometimes hide bad things that are happening in the school system, and bad results sometimes hide good things that are happening in the system. So you canāt just judge everything on a test.
Iām not saying you should do away with testing. Testing is useful. Itās useful to set a direction, to understand where the gaps may be. But itās not a placeāthe be-all and end-all. We made testing everything. It depends. A good test can give a teacher an enormous raise. It can keep a principal in their job. It can make sure that a school stays open. A bad test, the opposite: itāll fire the principal, fire the teacher, close a school down. Those are very high stakes.
And when you create such high stakes on one matrix like that, youāre bound to create all kinds of problems, first of all lots of anxiety, which is pervasive in the school system now. You canāt teach under anxiety. You have to teach under collaboration, under a more supportive environment. So thatās one.
The other part is itās been wide open for cheating. When everything depends on that, a personās livelihood, a personās, you know, ability to get a raise, and all of those things are dependent on the one test, thereās cheating. So thereās a lot of cheating in the system. In fact, we had one incident where 100 schools were seen with some irregularities in their testing, some of the erasures that were happening.
JAY: So how do you solve the problem? āCause one of the reasons for this was you were finding kids graduating, say, from, you know, elementary school who are actually illiterate. Thereās no way they should have been passing, but, you know, they were just passing through, and there needed to be some objective way to know how kids are doing.
SHALLAL: Right. I mean, thatās been happening throughout, in fact, people graduating out of high school and donāt read but for a second- or third-grade level.
We need to have more reading specialists, for instance, that could go on not just in elementary school but through middle school and through high school, a lot of teachers spending a lot of time in high school on remediation, trying to teach kids how to read, let alone teach them to learn. So thereās a lot of issues there that need to be addressed. Weāve created the situation where schools become the answer to all of societyās ills.
We have a lot of poverty in D.C. One out of five people in D.C. lives below poverty. One out of three children lives below poverty.
Kids come to school completely unprepared. We know by evidence and by track record that two-thirds of education happens outside the school, through family, parents, environment. You know, one-third only happens inside. So the teachers are having to make up for the two-thirds thatās missing for some of those kidsā lives. So teachers tell me that they have to bring fruits and vegetables for the kids just to give them something fresh to eat ācause they donāt see fresh food in their environment. They have to become social workers, mental health specialists, family counselors, nutrition, nurses, you name it. By the time a teacher is ready to teach, the dayās over.
JAY: How racist is all of this, meaning are the conditions for white poor any different?
SHALLAL: There arenāt really white poor to speak of in D.C.
JAY: In D.C.
SHALLAL: Yeah, very, very small numbers. Almost entirely all of the poverty is centered around African Americans and some Latinos.
JAY: And the standardized testing and all of this, you have said in the previous segment thereās been some improvement, but itās all in the demographic of people that have some money. Just look at that for a bit. But what is the substance of that improvement? Is it just kids are learning how to do tests?
SHALLAL: I think, if youāre going to judge it by that one matrix. But the fact of the matter is that schools and good neighborhoods are going to do well just by being there. First of all, their PTAs are very involved. They raise a lot of money. Some schools, $200,000 or $300,000 they raise in enrichment programs, in field trips, in things that they could do that other kids cannot possibly dream of doing. So you have that kind of thing.
And then you have outside the home. You know, kids get picked up from school, they get taken to tennis classes and swimming classes and enrichment classes, and they have tutors, and they have all of these opportunities that go way beyond whatās happening inside the school system.
JAY: So, to fix this, first of all you need not just the mayor; you need a city council, at the very least, who actually want to solve the problem of African-American poverty and lack of education. What would you do about it if you actually controlled the city council? What do your policies look like?
SHALLAL: You know, thereās an interest. I think D.C.ās a progressive town. There is an interest in making things better. So you need a vision. You need leadership. When the mayor comes upāand I promised I wouldnāt say anything negative.
JAY: Yeah, youāre getting on dangerous territory here.
SHALLAL: Iām running on dangerous territory. But when you hear over and over again that our schools are doing well, when Arne Duncan comes out and says we blew it out of the ballpark because our numbers have gone up, when President Obama comes out and saysā.
JAY: You can attack President Obama, ācause youāre not running against him.
SHALLAL: Got it. Got it.
JAY: So make it all about President Obama and youāve got a free rein.
SHALLAL: I got you. When he says, you know, that our school system in Washington, D.C., are doing well, theyāre basing it on the one number. The fact of the matter is that the NAEP results (the National Assessment for Educational Progress) have shown some increases year after year. Itās really hard to start arguing against that. And what it is is theyāre giving misinformation. Itās, like, half the story. The other half is whatās missing. The fact of the matter is that our black kids are doing worse.
JAY: Okay. So what would you do about it?
SHALLAL: Well, you have to start over again. You have to start by making sure that we have a commitment to that and admit that thereās a problem. Then you start to take away the focus on just standardized tests as the only way to judge.
And you have to infuse more resources to make up for poverty. Poverty is real. It affects the way a child learns. We have to make sure we have the wraparound services around a school to make sure that we make up for the things that are missing outside that kidās home. So you have to have social workers. You have to have family counselors. You have to have enrichment programs. You have to have mental health specialists. You have to have anger management type of work for some of these kids.
Iām proposing one thing to do is we have more universities around D.C. than we have high schools. The universities donāt pay property taxes. They can give back. Theyāre willing to give back. Thereās not a real conduit for universities to get involved in the school system, in our school system. Thatās a no-brainer. You bring them into the school system. You try to create programs so you can teach kids life. Some of these kids come without life skills. So I would say after fifth grade, when kids are getting ready to go from elementary school to middle school, you do a summer program, a six-week program to teach them life skillsāconflict resolution, you teach them about bullyingā.
JAY: Everything youāre talking about has a price tag. So when youāre sayingā.
SHALLAL: No, that doesnāt have a price tag. That does notā.
JAY: But all the increased social services do.
SHALLAL: Well, the increaseāyeah. But, you know, weāre paying for them on the other end anyway. We pay for them in many different ways. We have one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the entire country. We have a lot of our kidsāone-tenth of the population of all of D.C. are returning citizens, which means theyāve been to jail, theyāve served time. So all of these things cost an awful lot of money, much more than the services we need.
And the problem is we have the services; theyāre just not there to reach the people that need it the most. So we have to make them accessible. We have to have these services near or around the schools that need it, not just somewhere downtown.
So somehow we need to match up the needs of the people with the services that are available. We spend quite a bit of money in social services in D.C. Weāre actually pretty good at that. Just those social services arenāt reaching the people that need them.
JAY: So itās not a question of more resources; itās better-organized resources. Or both?
SHALLAL: I think [incompr.] we have an awful lot of waste, an awful lot of waste. But I think itās also both. I think it is about making sure that you line up the resources with the needs. Right now, every kid throughout the entire system gets the same amount of money. We need to make sure that we add a little bit more to needed schools.
JAY: Is part of the problem also that both in terms of curriculum and expectation, thereās no education about how are we going to get out of poverty? Thereās no sense of that kind of political discussion.
SHALLAL: Right.
JAY: And, like, the education either hasāyou have to have a realistic expectation that if I study hard, life is really going to get better, and to a large extent it doesnāt. You know, a lot of kids do graduate from high schools, and Baltimoreās not all that different from D.C., and thereās nothing next, thereās no second act, even if you did fairly well in school, never mind if you didnāt. And then thereās noānext to no discussion about, you know, how do we deal with this in a systemic political way. In other words, youāre notāthereās no way to learn how to think.
SHALLAL: Yeah. I think weāve also really commodified poverty. And poverty is big business now. So thereās a lot ofā.
JAY: So are prisons.
SHALLAL: Yes, absolutely.
JAY: And maybe weāre saying the same thing.
SHALLAL: That ties into all of that. So, you know, worse comes to worse, a kid doesnāt do well, they end up going to jail, hey, weāve got it. Itās a win-win for some group of people, right?
So I think in that sense theyāve figured out a way to monetize poverty. So thereās not a real incentive to end it, in that sense. So thatās really an important thing.
The other thing is we haveāin D.C., for instance, we have more jobs than people to fill them. We have more jobs in D.C. available. So when politicians get up and say, we need more jobs, we donāt need more jobs. We need to train people to get the jobs that are available. We need to bring back vocational training into schools, to make it so that kids that want to do other than go to college, something else, learn cosmetology, learn about auto mechanics, learn about IT, learn about things that donāt require a four-year college degreeāI think itās really important to bring those back in schools.
JAY: But do you think thereās been kind of a de facto understanding or policy thatās not stated that what we as a society are going to do in areas of chronic poverty, especially African-American and Hispanic, is weāre going to find the few bright lights and weāre going to make sure they do okay and to hell with everybody else?
SHALLAL: Well, thereās a lot of bright lights. Itās just I think those bright lights are not given the opportunity to shine.
JAY: But a few are.
SHALLAL: Yeah, yeah.
JAY: Thereās now a few doors open.
SHALLAL: Yes.
JAY: But in terms of trying to really do anything transformative to this chronic poverty and help the people that donāt shine, you know, a few do, and thereās always going to be a few kids that no matter what are going to come to the fore, and now maybe some of them are finding ways out. But everybody elseā.
SHALLAL: Yeah, I mean, we have this blame society. When somebodyās poor, we blame it on them. Itās their fault. Theyāre too lazy. They donāt seem to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. We hear that over and over again.
And the reality is, when you look at it, that a lot of people are in, you know, systemic poverty. Theyāyou know, you have a young mother who has a baby, and then she has to figure out a way to make a living. That babyāshe canāt drop off that baby somewhere and go off and find a job. And when she does find a job, itās a minimum-wage job. That minimum-wage job does not put a roof over her head. It puts her in a cycle of poverty. And suddenly sheās having baby number two, because thereās not enough counseling, thereās not enough opportunities, thereās not enough hope for that person. They did a study in Washington, D.C., where they were interviewing high school kids, kids that have dropped out. Their form of entertainment is having sex, because thereās nothing else to do. Thereās not enough programs. Thereās not enough after-school programs.
JAY: Now, how are you finding people responding to this campaign if this is the way youāre talking? Because the fact is the majority of people that vote are not going to be people that live in poverty.
SHALLAL: Well, whatās interesting, what Iām finding interesting is the debate has changed completely in this election cycle. The issues that Iāve been talking about have become picked up by all of the candidates. So everybodyās talking about improving schools now. Everybodyās talking about the achievement gap, which no one mentioned before. Everybody gets up and says how weāre doing so well in schools, and suddenly the achievement gap has become a big issue.
I brought race into this debate, into the conversation in this election, because race is oftentimes not talked about, because when you talk about things like gentrification which matter a lot to people, they matter much more to black people, they matter a lot more to people that have been living in the city for a long time and finding themselves unable to afford it. But for an average white person moving to the city, gentrification is pretty cool. It means that you have a nice coffee shop, you have some hipster clothing store around the corner, you have clean streets, you have more services.
JAY: But those are a lot of the people that are going to vote in this election.
SHALLAL: Not necessarily. I mean, I think, yes, a lot of people vote, and, you know, African Americans as well as white people vote. But I thinkā.
JAY: Well, not all hipsters are white, thatās for sure.
SHALLAL: Well, okay. Yeah, youāre right.
JAY: Especially in D.C. Thereās a lot of good government jobs and notāyou know, thereās a lot of African Americans have pretty good government jobs. And thereās a class question there, too [crosstalk]
SHALLAL: I agree. Maybe weāre talking about two different things, but hipsters are a different group. But, anywayā.
JAY: Yeah, culturally I have no idea what these categories are.
SHALLAL: I have youngāyou know, kids in their 20s, so I know what hipster is. We talk about that.
JAY: In terms of that I have no idea.
SHALLAL: Yeah, yeah.
But I think itās important to understand that when weāre talking about these issues, gentrification, that we talk the same language to each other, that gentrification in one group of people has a whole different meaning than to another group.
JAY: Okay. You said you introduced issues of race, you introduced issues of class in this election. So that gets to my next big question, and Iām going to ask it in the next segment, which is: whyād you run for mayor? And weāre going to take up that question in the final segment of this series of Reality Asserts Itself on The Real News Network.