The Doomsday Machine Still Exists – Daniel Ellsberg

Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg tells Paul Jay of “theAnalysis”, the danger of nuclear war is as present today as during the Cold War. He says seeking profit in spite of the risk of nuclear winter is “institutional madness”.




Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • A truly valuable set of observations, particularly from the viewpoint of a convinced, lifelong Imperialist. Ambassador Wilson was clearly speaking truth as he saw it, very much as Paul M. A. Linebarger had done with JFK. aw

  • Soviet republics reject absolute self-sufficiency

    the national revolutions in the former Soviet Union surprised most Kremlin watchers when they began in 1989. the overall wisdom was that, Beyond the Baltic levels of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia incorporated moldavian girls into the Soviet Union in 1940s the competition in the USSR believed they were Soviet.

    On the consistently quiet streets of Kishinev (at this instant Chisinau) throughout the Moldavian Republic, all the same, Ethnic Moldovans fought against ethnic Russians in nationalist clashes. within just 1990 inside Kiev, Hunger striking students starved for Ukrainian overall flexibility on the cold stone steps of the Maidan. In thinking about receiving 1991, The darkest days of Mikhail Gorbachev’s rule, european tanks barreled over protesters in Vilnius, Lithuania, lifting the lives of 14 civilians.

    The cries for national self conviction broke the formerly indivisible Soviet Union into a heap of quarreling fragments. The collapse of the USSR was similar to the partition of multinational empires into smaller nation states under the Treaty of Versailles, Which ended battle I. President Woodrow Wilson is incorrectly credited with coining the phrase “National self dedication” In his Fourteen Points presentation, Which had become the founding document for the breakup of European empires at Versailles in 1918.

    Wilson, in fact, Never uttered those words in this speech. in exchange, He advocated for self governance of all people in an extremely interdependent global economy within the League of Nations, The forerunner of the us, Formed to peace and security. When the Soviet empire finally flattened in 1991, Only Central Asia and this includes Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan had no real national movements seeking self-sufficiency. Central Asian commanders, The last to flee the falling apart union, Said they opt to stay at that time, Fearing the economic viability of their republics as nation states.

    A moldova beauty recent Gallup poll flips this traditional picture. far more than two decades after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Residents in seven out of 11 former Soviet republics were more likely to see harm than gain benefit breakup. answerers in Central Asian states except Uzbeks, Who were not polled were quite likely going to believe the collapse was beneficial.

    If associated with years later, Most residents of former Soviet republics are more than twice as likely to look grimly on the spliting up of their states from the USSR, What does this poll say about the desire for national self perseverance that was so pivotal in the early 1990s?

    lots of protesters in Ukraine’s capital, Kiev, Are braving cold weather to show against President Victor Yanukovych’s refusal to sign two European Union association agreements that would have facilitated trade, Finance and travel between Ukraine and north west Europe. Twenty two years after autonomy, Ukrainian protesters are waving the yellow and blue emblem of europe alongside the Ukrainian trident. The EU flag is not one quite possibly expect people to fight and die over, But indeed they do just that about 100 Ukrainians have ended up in hospitals. Unlike those of the early 1990s, Today’s protesters are more concerned with their economic health than national autonomy.

    Ukrainian protesters, i. e,nonetheless, are determined to jettison the country’s economic independence in this global economy. here in 2012, Ukraine’s national debt was a considerable 36 percent of GDP. Seeking its place in the worldwide economy, Ukraine rrs pulled between Europe and Russia. along with Georgia, Ukraine has become last to hold out from joining the Russian dominated Customs Union, Which is economically piecing back together most of the nations of former Soviet Union.

    incredibly last fall, As Yanukovych’s control pursued negotiations with the EU, Vladimir Putin’s government sought to make a show of Ukraine’s element the Russian economy. Moscow slowed freight web page visitors between Ukraine and Russia and paused Russian orders of Ukrainian steel, Autos and machinery. Persuaded by this test, In december, Yanukovych retracted from signing the EU agreement. Ukrainians loved the streets in protest. A public opinion poll late last year found that 45 percent of Ukrainians wanted closer collective with the EU while only 14 percent wanted to join the Customs Union, Which many fear would lead to a renewed Russian domination over the Ukrainian little brother.

    The anxiety over economic safety is not limited to Ukraine. Citizens in almost all the ex Soviet republics are registering displeasure with their states’ autonomy at a rate that virtually matches the indebtedness of those countries. In Armenia together with Belarus, the nation’s debts were 37 percent of GDP, While Moldova came in at 22 percent last year. The three states in the Gallup poll where residents were happy with their self inspiration Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, And Azerbaijan are oil rich countries with very significantly lower rates of national debt, ranging from 7 to 11 percent.

    What if one of the primary political mistakes of the 20th century was an irrational belief in national self determination over other forms of self rule? economic downturn and the failures of the Central European states after the Treaty of Versailles led to fascism and World War II. That war contributed to the integration of these states as republics or satellites of rival Cold War superpowers.

    A similar integration process is taking place again as Russian leaders seek to reincorporate former Soviet republics into their economic realm while the european union takes in the rest. The chief proponents of national self determination are rarely the crowds on the streets but rather intellectuals and entrepreneurs who stand to gain from sovereign boundaries over which they can rule. all of the enrichment of Yanukovych, Boris Yeltsin, Putin and former Turkmen dictator Saparmurat Niyazov is a great testament to the fact that there is a lot of money to be made by taking over a recently decolonized state.

    Historians are taking note of, regardless, That citizens have often been flexible inside their allegiances, Multilingual in their daily lives and program and populist rather than nationalist in their political ideologies. almost any Ukrainians, as an example, Easily slip between being Ukrainian and Russian and far more speak English and German. practical, Adaptable and modern, They do not want to tear off one another’s clothes as Ukrainian leaders recently did in parliament over the question of national language. a lot more often claustrophobic inside national boundaries, The crowds on the street want to be a part of broader foreign associations, Which would give them the authority to travel, Trade and express themselves freely.

    this is correct in Western Europe, South America and Asia because it is in Eastern Europe. If Catalonians or Scots were to gain their desired diversity from Spain and Britain, I would hazard a guess that within some three years, The new national leaders would seek membership in a global economic union one that would largely dissolve the national borders they fought to create.

    Wilson, basically we, Was right. As the expertise of ex Soviet republics reveals, cosmopolitan associations combined with local self governance may just be the new formula for sovereignty in a global economy.

  • Re: Paul Jay

    Thank you for providing your extraordinary, and timely, discussion with Joe Wilson; his wisdom and integrity provide a stark contrast to far too many of our current representatives, elected or appointed.

    While the succinct “Doomsday Machine…” audio/video version of the interview with Daniel Ellsberg does begin to address the premise of your query, “How much does the whole system of profit making, driving all of this?”, the written transcription provided is a tough read.
    The works of the late Chalmers Johnson, author of the three books of his Blowback Trilogy and “Dismantling the Empire”, provide valuable factual information to any discussion of the financial motives driving every element of the MIC.
    As Usual,

  • Plenty of information and statements from military contractors support the conclusion that profits are a prime motivator. As your previous article shows the big banks are in control and make huge profits from all of this.

    Nevertheless, if we are ever able to implement the Green New Deal, it will provide a popular base for displacing the military based economy.